Products related to Non-judgment:
-
On the Judgment of History
In the face of conflict and despair, we often console ourselves by saying that history will be the judge.Today’s oppressors may escape being held responsible for their crimes, but the future will condemn them.Those who stand up for progressive values are on the right side of history.As ideas once condemned to the dustbin of history—white supremacy, hypernationalism, even fascism—return to the world, threatening democratic institutions and values, can we still hold out hope that history will render its verdict?Joan Wallach Scott critically examines the belief that history will redeem us, revealing the implicit politics of appeals to the judgment of history.She argues that the notion of a linear, ever-improving direction of history hides the persistence of power structures and hinders the pursuit of alternative futures.This vision of necessary progress perpetuates the assumption that the nation-state is the culmination of history and the ultimate source for rectifying injustice.Scott considers the Nuremberg Tribunal and South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which claimed to carry out history’s judgment on Nazism and apartheid, and contrasts them with the movement for reparations for slavery in the United States.Advocates for reparations call into question a national history that has long ignored enslavement and its racist legacies.Only by this kind of critical questioning of the place of the nation-state as the final source of history’s judgment, this book shows, can we open up room for radically different conceptions of justice.
Price: 20.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Judgment
THE NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLING AUTHOR 'STUNNING' Peter James. 'FANTASTIC' Martina Cole. 'TERRIFIC' Ian Rankin. 'TIMELY' Karin Slaughter. 'TWISTY' J.P. Delaney. 'EXQUISITE' David Baldacci. It was just one night. But it was a night that would destroy everything. Judge Juliana Brody is a woman with principles. She is happily married, she doesn't drink, she doesn't lose control.She definitely doesn't sleep with a handsome stranger at a law convention.Except that, last night, that is exactly what she did.Matias understands that if anyone found out about their one-night stand, it would destroy Juliana's marriage and, most likely, her career.They agree that they will never see each other again. And then, a week later, he walks into her courtroom.Julia knew that her latest brief, a high-profile sex discrimination case, would make her some powerful enemies.But she didn't expect her own life, and the lives of her family, to be put in mortal danger... 'Gripping, trenchant and human. One of the best novels I've read this year' Stav Sherez. 'Stunning... I cannot remember when I last read a book so gripping and so satisfying' Peter James. 'A masterclass in tension, with complex characters and a twisty plot' J.P.Delaney.
Price: 7.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Judgment Road
An outlaw motorcycle club sets up shop next door to Sea Haven in the dangerously sexy new series from #1 New York Times bestselling author Christine Feehan. A brutal education in a Russian training facility for assassins has taught this group of men one thing: It's a long road to redemption. As the enforcer of the Torpedo Ink motorcycle club, Reaper lives for riding and fighting.He's a stone-cold killer who turns his wrath on those who deserve it.Feelings are a weakness he can't afford-until a gorgeous bartender gets under his skin... Near Sea Haven, the small town of Caspar has given Anya Rafferty a new lease on life. And she's desperate to hold on to her job at the biker bar, even if the scariest member of the club seems to have it out for her.But Reaper's imposing presence and smoldering looks just ratchet up the heat.Anya's touch is everything Reaper doesn't want-and it brands him to the bone.But when her secrets catch up to her, Reaper will have to choose between Anya and his club-his heart and his soul.
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Lost Judgment
When a convicted police officer discloses the murder of the student teacher who bullied his son to suicide, the dark secrets of a Yokohama high school rise t...
Price: 19.56 £ | Shipping*: £
-
How do I write a judgment in history?
When writing a judgment in history, you should carefully evaluate the evidence and sources available to you. Consider the context in which the events occurred, the perspectives of different groups involved, and the long-term consequences of the actions taken. It is important to support your judgment with specific examples and reasoning, and to acknowledge any limitations or uncertainties in your analysis. Finally, remember to present your judgment in a clear and concise manner, making sure to explain the significance of your conclusion in the broader historical context.
-
What is a factual judgment and what is a value judgment in the subject of history?
A factual judgment in history is a statement that is based on verifiable evidence and facts, such as dates, events, and locations. It is objective and can be proven or disproven through research and evidence. On the other hand, a value judgment in history is a subjective assessment or interpretation of historical events based on personal beliefs, opinions, or values. It involves making a judgment about the significance, morality, or impact of historical events, which can vary depending on individual perspectives.
-
What is a value judgment in relation to history?
A value judgment in relation to history is when an individual or group evaluates a historical event, person, or concept based on their own beliefs, morals, or values. It involves making subjective assessments about the significance, morality, or impact of past events. Value judgments can influence how history is interpreted, remembered, and taught, as they can shape the narrative and understanding of the past. It is important for historians to be aware of their own biases and values when making interpretations to ensure a more objective and balanced view of history.
-
What is the difference between factual judgment and value judgment?
Factual judgment is based on objective, verifiable information and evidence, while value judgment is based on subjective beliefs, opinions, and personal values. Factual judgment can be proven or disproven with evidence, while value judgment is based on individual perspectives and cannot be objectively proven. Factual judgment is often used in scientific, logical, or empirical reasoning, while value judgment is often used in ethical, moral, or personal decision-making.
Similar search terms for Non-judgment:
-
The Judgment of Culture : Cultural Assumptions in American Law
Legal systems do not operate in isolation but in complex cultural contexts. This original and thought-provoking volume considers how cultural assumptions are built into American legal decision-making, drawing on a series of case studies to demonstrate the range of ways courts express their understanding of human nature, social relationships, and the sense of orderliness that cultural schemes purport to offer.Unpacking issues such as native heritage, male circumcision, and natural law, Rosen provides fresh insight into socio-legal studies, drawing on his extensive experience as both an anthropologist and a law professional to provide a unique perspective on the important issue of law and cultural practice. The Judgement of Culture will make informative reading for students and scholars of anthropology, law, and related subjects across the social sciences.
Price: 37.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
The Judgment Books
Reproduction of the original: The Judgment Books by E.F Benson
Price: 32.90 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Critique of Judgment
“Pluhar maintains a fine, even tone throughout. . . . Those who have found the prospect of teaching the third Critique daunting will admire its clarity. . . . No one will be disappointed.” —Timothy Sean Quinn, The Review of Metaphysics Contents:Foreword.Translator’s Preface. Translator’s Introduction. Critique of Judgment. Preface. Introduction. I. Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. II. Critique of Teleological Judgment. Appendix: Methodology of Teleological Judgment. Translator’s Supplement: First Introduction to the Critique of Judgment. Selected Bibliography. Glossary. Index
Price: 27.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Last Judgment / Supplements
Price: 12.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
Is the judgment final?
Yes, the judgment is final. Once a judgment has been made by a court, it is legally binding and cannot be changed unless there are specific legal grounds for an appeal or modification. Parties involved in the case must abide by the judgment and its terms, and failure to do so can result in legal consequences. It is important to carefully consider the implications of a judgment before it is made, as it is difficult to reverse once it has been finalized.
-
What is the value judgment on the history of the Stasi?
The value judgment on the history of the Stasi, the former East German secret police, is overwhelmingly negative. The Stasi is widely condemned for its extensive surveillance, repression, and human rights abuses during its existence from 1950 to 1990. The organization's tactics, including spying on citizens, infiltrating society, and using informants, are seen as a gross violation of individual freedoms and privacy. The Stasi's legacy is one of fear, distrust, and trauma for many who lived under its rule, and its history serves as a reminder of the dangers of unchecked state power and the importance of protecting civil liberties.
-
What is the difference between a factual judgment and a value judgment?
A factual judgment is based on verifiable evidence and objective information, while a value judgment is based on personal beliefs, preferences, or moral principles. Factual judgments can be proven or disproven through evidence and logic, while value judgments are subjective and influenced by individual perspectives and values. Factual judgments deal with what is true or false, while value judgments deal with what is good or bad, right or wrong based on personal values and beliefs.
-
What is the difference between a regular judgment and a moral judgment?
A regular judgment is based on objective criteria, such as evidence, facts, and logic, while a moral judgment is based on subjective beliefs about what is right or wrong. Regular judgments are often made in legal or professional contexts, while moral judgments are more personal and based on individual values and ethics. Regular judgments are often used to make decisions in a fair and impartial manner, while moral judgments are influenced by emotions, cultural norms, and personal experiences.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.